Upcoming National Meeting 2024 Canadian Tax Workshop For U.S. Companies The COST Canadian Tax Workshop for US Companies covers the key tax issues U.S. companies who are doing business with Canadians or in Canada need to know. The primary focus of the Workshop will be on GST, HST and Income Tax but will also cover QST, Payroll and Property Taxes. Attendees will also participate in an interactive audit session covering Canadian tax issues that they’ve been dealing with.
Legislative Alert ISSUE 24-37; October 15, 2024 Call to Action: Oregon Measure 118 Campaign Hits Full Speed; COST Comments on Proposed Amendments to Tex. Admin. Code § 3.330
Cost Conscious ISSUE 24-20; October 4, 2024 Earlier this week, Louisiana governor Jeff Landry announced his plan for a November special session to address tax reform. His plan includes cuts to the corporate and individual income tax rates, the elimination of the corporate franchise tax, and allowing local governments to exempt inventory from property tax. These tax reductions will be offset by the elimination and/or restructuring of various
COST - Council on State Taxation Amicus Briefs Dine Brands Global, Inc. V. Eubanks and The Walt Disney Company v. Eubanks COST filed an amicus brief on June 14 asking the Michigan Supreme Court to affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals in Dine Brands Global, Inc. V. Eubanks and The Walt Disney Company v. Eubanks, where the court held an examination or audit conducted by the Treasurer was not an “action or proceeding” under the Michigan Unclaimed Property Act and did not toll the statute of limitations
COST - Council on State Taxation COST Studies, Articles & Reports 2024 State and Local Amnesty Programs Tracker of most state and local tax amnesty programs enacted and conducted in 2024.
COST - Council on State Taxation COST Comments & Testimony Comments on Texas Proposed Rule 3.330 On October 11, COST submitted comments to the Texas Comptroller suggesting proposed changes to Rule 3.330 represent an expansion of the sales tax base that is not supported by any statutory change and is in direct opposition to Texas Supreme Court jurisprudence. The comments also request a hearing and recommend that any change in administrative policy should apply only prospectively.