cost amicus briefs

 

One of COST's long-standing roles is to file court briefs in support of its members and issues relevant to its members in state and local tax cases.  The decision to support an issue is discussed by the COST Lawyers Coordinating Subcommittee and is voted on by the COST Board of Directors.  COST Staff typically draft the briefs.  The factors supporting a decision to file an amicus brief include whether the issue is of general importance to COST's membership, whether COST can add a unique perspective not otherwise available to the court, and whether the case has reached the highest state court or the U.S. Supreme Court.  To view the complete criteria, please click here.  Please contact Doug Lindholm for more information.

 

State: 

Date StateTitle
05/01/2013CaliforniaSchmeer v. Los Angeles County
03/12/2013MarylandGore Enterprise Holdings v. Maryland
02/08/2013IllinoisMet Life v. Illinois DOR
01/25/2013MichiganIBM v. Michigan
12/17/2012NevadaNV Energy vs. NV
12/15/2012CaliforniaSchmeer v Los Angeles
11/01/2012AlabamaKimberly-Clark v. Alabama(2)
10/12/2012LouisianaTIN, Inc. v. Washington Parish
09/20/2012IndianaIndiana Department of Revenue vs. Miller Brewing Company
08/27/2012New JerseyAmerican Express Travel Related Services Company Inc., v. NJ
05/29/2012CaliforniaElk Hills v. SBE
03/14/2012South CarolinaCarMax vs. South Carolina Department of Revenue
02/23/2012West VirginaConAgra v. WV
02/21/2012CaliforniaNetJets vs. Guillory
11/22/2011CaliforniaApple v. FTB
11/10/2011CaliforniaGillette v. FTB
09/19/2011North CarolinaDelhaize v. North Carolina , NC Ct. App.
09/12/2011WashingtonTesoro v. Washington
08/19/2011South CarolinaBodman v. South Carolina
12345678910